Using PDB (Debug Symbols) When Compiling in Release Mode

Bit by yet another not-so-well documented "feature" in Microsoft .Net.  We were compiling in release mode for QA, since we've seen other behavioral differences between debug and release.  We also wanted to emit the line numbers in the stack trace so the engineers would have a better idea of what caused the error.  We added the /degub:pdbonly option, but left the /optimize+.  We noticed that some of the errors when compared to the line numbers didn't make sense.  It turned out that most of the stack trace was wrong... or at least wrong when compared to the original source code.

If you want to emit debug symbols, ie. pdb files, when compiling in release mode, you have to disable optimizations.  Compiler optimizations will often reorganize instructions for the most efficient execution.  As a result, any stack trace will produce unexpected line numbers... you'll get the line number in the newly optimized code, not the line in your original source code.

Disabling Optimizations and Enabling pdb only

If compiling at the command line, or with nant:

/debug:pdbonly /optimize-
or simply
/debug:pdbonly

In Visual Studio:

Under project properties:
  1. Uncheck "Enable Optimization"
  2. In the "Advanced ..." settings, choose "pdb-only" under Output->Debug Info.




The statement in the Microsoft docs: "It is possible to combine the /optimize and /debug options." -- is not entirely accurate.

Based on Microsoft's documentation, I'm placing this in the "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." category.

References:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adding New Microsoft Extensions to Legacy WCF and ASMX Web Services

I was asked by several people recently: Can I use dependency injection with my legacy WCF and ASMX web services? Microsoft has some new stuff they released with core–specifically, a new configuration system, caching, and logging providers. Can I use them in my legacy WCF and ASMX web services? The answer to both is yes you can! In fact, I recommend it! To illustrate this, we’ll take a look at taking a sample application that has a WCF service and a ASMX service and we’ll: Add dependency injection using Ninject. Add the new Configuration provider from the new  Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration  packages. Add caching functionality using Microsoft’s new  Microsoft.Extensions.Caching  packages. Use the new logging providers from  Microsoft.Extensions.Logging  packages. Dependency Injection We use Ninject, but you can just as easily use AutoFac or SimpleInjector as they also have packaged integrations for WCF. You can use other containers, but may need to hand-roll your
Read more

Using NHibernate in Asp.Net Core

Starting with version 5.1, NHibernate now supports .Net Core and .Netstandard as well as the full framework. Let’s take a quick look at how to set it up in an ASP.Net Core 2.x/3.x application. Configuration As of this writing, NHibernate doesn’t support the configuration system within Asp.Net Core based on Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration. The good news is, you don’t have to use a  hibernate.cfg.xml  file or the   section in app.config. You can add the properies manually, and pull the values from Asp.Net Core’s configuration, taking advantage of all the goodies that come with it. This opens up a world of configuration deployment possibilities. var config = new Configuration (); IDictionary < string , string > properties = new Dictionary < string , string > { { "connection.connection_string" , Configuration . GetConnectionString ( "Default" ) }, { "dialect" , "NHibernate.Dialect.SQLiteDialect" },
Read more

Code Coverage for Multiple Projects in a Single Build using Dotnet Test and Coverlet

Most of the time, your solution will have more than one project and a test unit project for each of those. Azure DevOps only, as of this writing, only allows you to update a single code coverage summary. If you upload more than one, each overwrites the next and only the last one remains. To accomplish this, we can use the merge functionality in Coverlet . I use the MSBuild extension, because it is better suited for CI pipelines. In your test project XML, add the package... <PackageReference Include="coverlet.msbuild" Version="2.7.0">     <PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets>     <IncludeAssets>runtime; build; native; contentfiles; analyzers</IncludeAssets> </PackageReference> Then, in your dotnet test command or msbuild command, tell it to use Coverlet and to merge results. If you're using Azure DevOps, your test task looks this... (line wrapped for read ability in the article) - task: DotNetCoreCLI@2 displayName: Test i
Read more